Concit Ensuring our Future
Concit Ensuring our Future

OIC—the rising Caliphate of Islam

The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is the second largest inter-governmental organisation after the United Nations (UN). It has a membership of 57 countries, called “member states”, that are spread over four continents including the Palestinian Authority. It meets every year to deliberate over issues of concern to the member states and the united UMMAH.

The OIC is using the term “Ummah” on its website for the “Muslim Nation”. Let’s be clear here—this is now the body that represents the global interests of the Ummah. The Secretary of the OIC is even on record saying that the “OIC fulfils the function of a Caliphate”.

The OIC is the rising Islamic Caliphate that will eventually become the real Caliphate, governing all Islamic states— and the problem is that most people in the West don’t even know about the OIC!

More concerning is that part of the OIC’s current aims, as stated on its website, is to: “Protect and defend the true image of Islam, to combat defamation of Islam”—which means that its mandate is also reaching into the West.

In the past it was stated on the OIC website that one of its’ aims was to:

“to assist Muslim minorities and communities ‘outside of the Member states’ (ie in the West) to preserve their dignity, cultural and religious identity.” Understand it is also claiming jurisdiction over Muslims living in the West.

The OIC was the body behind the CAIRO declaration of Human Rights—essentially Human Rights according to the Islamic Sharia. Whereas the 1948 UN Charter of Human Rights gave Muslim women equal rights to men for example, the 1990 CAIRO Declaration maintains women as inferior as per the Sharia. The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights has been signed by all 57 Islamic Nations and submitted to the United Nations to represent the views of these Islamic Nations, despite what the UN Charter maintains about tolerance and equality. Those nations are enforcing the principals of Sharia—first and foremost above any man-made laws like the UN Human Rights Charter. See article 24 and 25 of the Cairo Declaration below.

Screen Shot 2016-08-22 at 9.24.20 PM

Human Rights and Terrorism

What the OIC means when it refers to Human Rights is that it means Islamic Human Rights according to Sharia Law. In its Charter when it says “to promote human rights and fundamental freedoms,” it is  talking about Islamic human rights according to Sharia in which non-Muslims are not equal but inferior to Muslims.

Under Sharia any Christian Cross erected outside a church is considered a Human Rights violation to a Muslim—because it goes against Sharia.

Under Sharia submitted Christians are forced to comply with Muslim human rights. They must agree to “no crosses on the outside of churches, no bells, no raising our voices and no burying our dead next to Muslim dead.”

Screen Shot 2016-08-22 at 9.51.56 PM

As Muslims come into the West we are witnessing the removal of crosses from public places, because of this twisted concept of protecting Muslim-only Human Rights.

“Contemporary Racism” according to the OIC means cultural not just biological discrimination and disparagement. In other words, “criticism of Islam—is Racism” according to the OIC. So when the Islamic world refers to “racism” it means criticism of Islam and Muslims by non-Muslims.

When the OIC use the term terrorism it is a term defined according to Sharia.

In Sharia, terrorism is defined as “killing a Muslim without right”. The term “Terrorism” does not relate to the killing of non-Muslims without right—only Muslims. (And “right” is also defined as per Sharia, as there are certain permissible reasons to kill a Muslim for example apostasy, sodomy, criticising Islam or the Prophet.)

The OIC also claim through its version of Islamic Human Rights that Muslims should be accommodated in the West and not be expected to assimilate.

Screen Shot 2016-08-22 at 10.37.51 PM

The term “Islamophobia” was created by the Muslim Brotherhood and then adopted by the OIC to hold anyone to account anywhere in the world that was opposed to Islam.

In the 2005 OIC Summit the 57 Muslim leaders created a ten-year Action Program which included combating Islamophobia. Section three of that plan moved that they involve the UN to “adopt a UN international resolution to counter Islamophobia and get all of its member states including the West to enact laws to counter Islamophobia including deterrent punishments”.

Screen Shot 2016-08-24 at 12.52.52 AM

It is mind boggling to consider that the OIC is actually forcing Sharia onto the West using the United Nations. In the Summits the Muslim only membership is deciding the UN resolutions to be imposed on non-Islamic nations, in order to punish people in the West for going against the Sharia laws of Islamic countries.

Islamophobia is really just the Islamic law of “slander” with a new name. Slander under Islam is a very different concept to the West’s understanding of the term slander derived from “bearing false witness”.

According to Islamic law, slander dictates what a non-Muslims can and can’t say about Islam. Slander by definition in Islamic law occurs when a non-Muslim mentions anything to a Muslim that he would not like, or reveals anything that does not benefit Islam or a Muslim. Even the truth is slander in Islam, if a Muslim finds it offensive or if it puts Islam in a bad light.

Part of the OIC plan was to reinforce the point by co-ordinating days of rage where Muslims would turn on non Muslims and blame the violence on some offence. Cartoons, books, films have all served to be blamed for these “days of rage” protests and resultant killings of non Muslims. The OIC incite this violence in order to force non-Muslim governments to submit to these Islamic “slander laws” to avoid violent Muslim backlash.

This is setting up nothing more than a “battered wife syndrome” on a global stage. We are witnessing Muslims the world over blaming bombings, killings and stabbings on the fault of non-Muslims because of some perceived offence. If the West didn’t draw offensive Muhammad cartoons or write offensive books or kill Muslims during acts of war in the Middle East (including against ISIS) then there would be no need for Muslims to backlash against non-Muslims. This is the thinking of bullies.

As a result the OIC has actually managed to influence the United Nations to adopt the 1618 resolution that asked for action on Islamophobia by all member Governments in the world (including the West) against offending Muslims.

The United Nations—a foreign entity—is now dictating Sharia laws onto the West from the dictates of the OIC. That is how we are getting Sharia law passed into our legal framework. 18C Offence legislation is being used by Muslims on the Australian public for this purpose—and we need it gone.

The 57 states of OIC are acting just like an Islamic Caliphate, coming together to decide what is needed to protect and further Islam and the Ummah across the world. It is manipulating our membership to the United Nations in order to install Sharia Law onto our legal statutes—and our dopey politicians, too eager to fit in, have no understanding of the dangerous game being played out.

It is time we got out of the UN and protected our laws, our culture and our Western values. The OIC should have no bearing on Australia, Australian law or the citizenry of Australia.

(Watch this Governmental Security Advisor’s video—who explains it all in much detail. 1.15 hours)

IC CHARTER(see section 12):