Do we really want civil war?

The Finsbury Retribution attack by an Englishman mounting a footpath and driving at Muslims was a game changer for the West. It is the first time a westerner used terror tactics against Muslims.

Nor was it surprising that the perpetrator, Father-of-four, Darren Osborne, after being apprehended by those at the scene, said  “I have done my bit”.

Friends and neighbours informed the media that Darren changed towards Muslims after the London terror attacks.

The majority of comments on Facebook pages regarding the attack had anticipated someone, somewhere eventually would take this backlash action against the Muslim community. While there was genuine concern expressed for the innocents, the majority of comments showed a hardening against those that support terrorism as a part of their religious ideology.

The Commonwealth, as much as secular people try to deny it, was built upon 1200 years of Bible traditions and laws, first through the Kings of England since 778AD and then through people’s Parliaments. The God of the Christian Bible is a god of nations and boundaries—welcoming strangers to live amongst his people. However there was a rider, that all strangers were to live according the laws of the lands and be judged equally according to those same laws without discrimination.

Under Secular Humanism—the religion of Communism, that seeks to eliminate all borders and treat all cultures as equal, Islam was reintroduced to the West. Its followers were placed above our laws by “cultural considerations” through the various UN Agreements resulting from our membership of the Communist United Nations.

Islam’s CAUSE is global domination and whose TRUE BELIEVERS according to the Quran, are those who make that happen—those who give their lives and possessions for world domination of Islam. A jihadist in fact is the highest form of believer in Islam. They are ordered not to associate with other Muslims but only help when required. They are brothers unto themselves. 

Muslims are required under the sharia rules of taqiyya”, to hide jihadists and their weaponry from hostile Authorities. Muslims are also not permitted kill fellow Muslims—only apostates, atheists and disbelievers. Muslims will never stop jihadists as they are the literal “Crusaders of Islam”. Through Islam Muhammad brought all of Arabia under submission in just 10 years using terrorism. Every lone wolf or terrorist attack furthers Islam’s terror hold on the West for the same purpose.

THIS is what the Secular humanists have introduced in Western nations—a dominating, hyper masculine culture that believes it has the right to use terrorism in order to dominate a host country for their religion of Islam.

Media staff have been silenced from holding Islam in any way connected to the actions of their jihadists. Brave Journalists who do make the connection like Andrew Bolt and Pamela Gellar have had to go into hiding because of Muslim death threats. Parliamentarians that stand against Islamic tyranny like Wilders and Hanson endure 24-hour body guards for the price of their concerns. 

On 20th of June in 2017 one Englishman decided to take matters in his own hands against the corruption of his once sovereign Government, the blatant bias of the judiciary, the lies of the politically correct media and the correctly placed fear of the police and mowed down eight Muslims near a mosque known for launching jihadists like the shoe bomber onto his people.

What surprised me most about that event, was that I, like many others, felt numb inside for the victims. Resentment is building against the terror of Islam and the government that has placed its population in this position of impotence against this menace.

Islam will not allow assimilation. That leaves only occupation, conversion or civil war. It is time to have a more realistic conversation about Islam and its connection to terrorism—for all of our sakes.

The Three Limitations to Multiculturalism

When Multiculturalism was adopted as a policy for Australia three commonsense limitations were placed on the Policy to safeguard Australians from abuse. This documentation was readily available on the Government website up to 2014. However the page can no longer be found. (The link was http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/multicultural/agenda/agenda89/whatismu.htm.)

Fortunately the content of those limitations has been preserved as follows.

“Multicultural policies are based upon the premises that:

1. ALL Australians should have an overriding and unifying commitment to Australia, to its interests and future FIRST and foremost;

This premise requires that all cultures in Australia supports Australia’s foreign policy for example. The very idea that a citizen in Australia can go and fight for ISIS against Australia in the Middle East is in contravention to this limitation. If any culture continues to support a foreign power like the UMMAH over Australia first, then we MUST consider that culture unfit for resettlement into Australia.

2. ALL Australians to accept …the Constitution and the rule of LAW, tolerance and equality, Parliamentary DEMOCRACY, freedom of speech and religion, English as the national language and EQUALITY of the sexes;

When Islamic schools teach that Sharia Law dominates over Democracy because democracy it is a man-made system, that institution goes against this principle. Mosques teaching that women are not equal to men or non Muslims are not equal to Muslims is equally unfit to continue to operate in our land under this multicultural limitation. Freedom of speech is an aspect of our Australian culture that cannot  be respected by Islam. Hizb-ut Tahrir in their Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia goes against everyone of the these ideals adding the requirement of Arabic as Australia’s main language and frankly speaking needs to be removed from our shores as seditious and in complete contravention to these Limitations.

3. Multicultural policies impose obligations as well as conferring rights: the right to express one’s own culture and beliefs involves a reciprocal responsibility to accept the right of others to express their views and values.

Islam must accept that Australia is an alcohol and pork consuming country. Our dress, culture and freedoms are preserved by this limitation. Islam MUST respect our culture. We can never tolerate the intolerance of Islam.

These limitations have been completely ignored by Government Departments and authorities only focussing on the rights of refugees and immigrants into our country. Our Australian culture also has a right to exist and be protected. It is time we demanded from our Government and multiculturalists that their duty of protection extends to Australians, our values and culture FIRST. We demand that these limitations be upheld and laws be put into place that can be used to remove people unfit for resettlement into our open, tolerant, friendly society according to these limitations.

 

 

RAMADAN 2017 Warning: Manchester just the beginning

Ramadan is a Muslim month of sacrifice. According to Islamic practice, sacrifice during Ramadan can be considered more valuable than that made at other times, so a call to martyrdom during the month has more allure to some Muslims during this time.

ISIS also declared itself a Caliphate during Ramadan on 29 June 2014.
In the past two years we have seen the large killings against the West by Muslims were during Ramadan.
(France, Tunisia, Kuwait, Orlando, Turkey Airport)
The 2017 Manchester Pop Concert Bombing may just be the precursor for the 2017 Ramadan period, according to the latest ISIS video released just after the bombing.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comparing Islam to Australian Values

The Immigration Department listed on their website the following values as being the societal values of Australia.

A direct comparison of Islamic values to Australian values shows an incompatibility that must question the suitability of any immigrants followers of Islam.

The Islamic values are taken from the Cairo Declaration signed by 58 countries, OIC website—the largest caliphate in the world, and Sharia Manual, all underpinned by the verses within the Qu’ran.

Why Muslims stay silent on terrorism

The terror attack on Westminster Bridge and the Houses of Parliament left at least four people dead, including PC Keith Palmer, and a further 29 injured.

This infamous picture taken on the bridge shows a Muslim female walking past the carnage with her hand shielding her vision and her eyes fixed firmly on her phone. Islam has a morality code vastly different to the West, formed from its foundations in the Qu’ran, Hadiths and Sharia. Her behaviour and the silence of Muslims across the world concerning terrorism can be explained by considering these 22 facts about Islam.

  • There is no freedom of religion.
  • Conversion away from Islam (even to atheism) is apostasy and subject to the penalty of death.
  • A non-Muslim—a “Kafir”, is never equal to a Muslim.
  • Democracy cannot truly exist in Islam because it makes a non-Muslim equal to a Muslim.
  • There is no Golden Rule (Do unto others as you would do unto you.)
  • It is not illegal to kill a Kafir.
  • A Muslim in Court may testify against a Kafir, but a Kafir cannot testify against a Muslim.
  • Justice is dualistic, there is one law for Muslim males and another set of laws for Muslim women and Kafirs.
  • A Kafir cannot bear arms.
  • There is no equality for women in Islam and women can be beaten.
  • A Muslim is not the friend of the Kafir. Muslims are advised not take Kafirs as friends in preference to other Muslims. Those that do this will have none of Allah’s protection, and will only have themselves as guards.
  • The Nation of Islam is called the the Ummah. It has no land boundaries.
  • All Muslims are called to protect the Ummah.
  • Muslims are called to lie if it furthers Islam or to protect jihad from Kafir authorities.
  • National constitutions are man-made documents of ignorance—jahiliyah as all Governments should be ruled by Sharia.
  • Unlike Common Law Sharia is not interpretive, nor can it be changed.
  • There is no critical thought as the penalty for criticism of Islam or the Prophet is death.
  • A non-Muslim may not offend a Muslim even if what they are speaking out is the truth.
  • Jihad is a requirement of Islam.
  • The purpose of jihad is to increase Allah’s sovereignty in the world, personally and by geography.
  • A true believer supports jihad with their lives, belongings, protection or money.
  • Islam divides the world into dar el-salaam (the abode of peace) where Islam reigns; and dar-el harb (the abode of war) anywhere in the world not subjugated to Islam…where lying is also considered a necessary; evil, rape and murder of non-Muslims ranks as good.

Muhammad modelled these principals and subdued all of Arabia under Islam in just 10 years. The eventual goal of Islam, often referred to as the “cause of Allah” is the subjugation of the world for Islam.

Most moderates of Islam view terrorists as the soldiers of Islam necessary for the subjugation of the world to Islam—the ultimate objective of Islam and Allah’s cause. That is why Muslims don’t speak out against terrorism.

 

Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/176865740/Behind-Islamic-Terrorism-in-Myanmar

How Islam fails Multiculturalism

“Multiculturalism” assumes that our laws, social framework, technology and amenities will create such a welcoming and friendly atmosphere that all people will assimilate with us —because of our “superior” lifestyle.

The problem with this view is that it overlooks the dynamic effect religion plays in people’s lives. It also denies that fact people could have more respect for their religious beliefs than the worldly offerings of a host country. At its heart multiculturalism denies the importance of God and religion to people. It assumes all religious attitudes are the same and heading towards the same goal and eventually everyone will just blend together in some great melting pot once the day-to-day cares like housing, food and amenities are sorted.

It is a form of passive tolerance while on the surface it might appear “humane it is actually more like…careless indifference. This insensitivity to deeply religious cultures can be as harmful as aggression, as it incites a defiance of the laws of our society, especially in those areas where the incompatibility between the two religious cultures is not understood or recognised.

Anyone who has studied axiology—the Theory of Values will tell you that God is the highest order driver of humans. A person will give up everything to live his life according to his beliefs around his god—above his children, spouse, home, job, even his country. By ignoring the influence of this value and not allowing discussion about the clash of these two values in Australia, namely between an Islam and Christian worldview is like ignoring the massive elephant in the room.

Read the rest of this entry »

Supreme Court: Islam, Humanism not protected by law

There is a reason why the majority of Australians are feeling voiceless in their own society. There is a violation to our freedoms that is being committed by multiculturalists in our government bodies… using “religious freedom”.

In 1982 the subject of Religion in Australia was investigated by the Supreme Court in Victoria over a case where Scientology wanted tax exemptions. In reviewing this case the judges made some crucial decisions about religion which removes the hold both “Secular Humanism” and Islam currently have on our society. The Government bias towards these two religions is also out of line with the way this Supreme Court Judgement viewed their powers and paves the way for us to take back our voice and demand immediate changes on both fronts.

Read the rest of this entry »

America’s First War was against Muslims 200 Years Ago

When Thomas Jefferson saw there was no negotiating with Muslim pirate overlords, he formed what is now the Marines (sea going soldiers). These Marines were attached to U. S. Merchant vessels. When the Muslims attacked U.S. merchant vessels they were repulsed by armed soldiers, but there is more.

The Marines followed the Muslims back to their villages and killed every man, woman, and child in the village. It didn’t take long for the Muslims to leave U.S. Merchant vessels alone.

English and French merchant vessels started running up our flag when entering the Mediterranean to secure safe travel. That is why the marine Hymn contains the verse, “To the Shores of Tripoli ” one of the ports the pirates used.

THE HISTORY: At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the “Barbary Pirates”) were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic and piracy was costing the American purse 20% of their total economy.

Read the rest of this entry »

DUTTON: Clean up our Egyptian Embassy in Cairo

Now that ISIS have officially declared war on the Egyptian Copts we must place Christians from Egypt as a priority to be considered for refugee settlement.

The threats from Islamic militants are not hollow.

Anti-Islam pages in Australia have had numerous photos passed onto them of murdered Christian Copts in recent days that are just not making Australian media. (Warning graphic images)

Read the rest of this entry »

Time to look at our Immigration Policies and Courts

Four shocking cases have surfaced in the past two weeks that are telling ordinary Australians that our immigration system is compromised and needs serious overhaul. It appears that if you are Christian and male in particular you are on your own. Australia only caters to victimised Muslim females and their families.

Read the rest of this entry »

Older posts «