Ban the Koran for “Swearing In” and Here is Why

Ed Husic officially sworn in on the Koran by Governor General Quentin Bryce at Government House in Canberra. Picture: Penny Bradfield Source: Supplied

In 2013 the first Muslim MP, Ed Husic swore in as the Prime Minister’s new parliamentary secretary on the Koran. In 2016 he convinced Anne Aly the second Muslim elected into the Australian Parliament, to do the same.

This is the set of principles they are both swearing, as their “moral code”. They include gender inequality, religious intolerance, anti-democracy, bigotry, inequality and racism—all of it very unAustralian, but there is more.

The verses below are just only a handful lifted from the Koran and for every verse here, there are many others to support them. They represent is the Koranic mindset and underpin the behaviour of the believer and for the most part have also made their way into Sharia Law applications (including lying—big chapter on how to do that). 

These universal tenets of Islam don’t belong in Australia let alone in our Australian Parliament. The Koran needs to be removed as a suitable text for swearing in by Members of Parliament as its tenets are counter-cultural to the foundations of Australian Society and the laws of this land. The cause of Islam for Australia is to bring Australia under submission to Islam, remove democracy and replace it with Sharia. Hardly suitable for swearing in an Australian MP.

Tenets of Islam:

1. MP’s to Hide their faith: Qur’an (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.”

2. Sharia Law over Australian Law: Qur’an (33:36)“It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision.”

3. Islam for all Australia: Qur’an (8:39)“And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah” . (Allah is the deity of Islam and this commandment constitutes the CAUSE of Islam…”religion…only for Allah”—no others.)

Read the rest of this entry »

OIC—the rising Caliphate of Islam

The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is the second largest inter-governmental organisation after the United Nations (UN). It has a membership of 57 countries, called “member states”, that are spread over four continents including the Palestinian Authority. It meets every year to deliberate over issues of concern to the member states and the united UMMAH.

The OIC is using the term “Ummah” on its website for the “Muslim Nation”. Let’s be clear here—this is now the body that represents the global interests of the Ummah. The Secretary of the OIC is even on record saying that the “OIC fulfils the function of a Caliphate”.

The OIC is the rising Islamic Caliphate that will eventually become the real Caliphate, governing all Islamic states— and the problem is that most people in the West don’t even know about the OIC!

More concerning is that part of the OIC’s current aims, as stated on its website, is to: “Protect and defend the true image of Islam, to combat defamation of Islam”—which means that its mandate is also reaching into the West.

In the past it was stated on the OIC website that one of its’ aims was to:

“to assist Muslim minorities and communities ‘outside of the Member states’ (ie in the West) to preserve their dignity, cultural and religious identity.” Understand it is also claiming jurisdiction over Muslims living in the West.

Read the rest of this entry »

TREASON—Hawke, Keating, Rudd, Gillard, and Turnbull

SMARTEST THING we ever did as a nation—voted NO to this Referendum.

SMARTEST THING we ever did as a nation—was voted NO to this Referendum.

In November 1999 Australians through a nationwide Referendum decided NOT to create a Republic. This was a confirmation to the Government that Australians wanted to remain as Australian with an Australian Constitution—we wanted to stay with what we knew. But what the Australian public didn’t know is that our Labor politicians were working really hard behind our backs.

One month earlier, on United Nations Day, the UN introduced a Charter for Global Governance (One World Government under the United Nations). They called it Global Democracy but it really stands for “International Socialism”. In October 1999, our Referendum the UN voted us in to its ranks…one month BEFORE our Referendum.

Next, the politicians removed the  “Oath of Allegiance to the Crown”  from our Law Courts. They sold us out to the United Nations expecting Australia to vote “Yes for the Republic” by Referendum.

Read the rest of this entry »

If Anjem got 10 years—then Islam should get LIFE

Anjem Choudary CREDIT: VELAR GRANT/REX/SHUTTERSTOCK

 

BRITAIN: Yesterday, people across the world including in Australia, celebrated as they witnessed Anjem Choudry receive 10 years jail for his transgressions against the British public. He has always advocated establishing Sharia Law in Britain, the inequality of women and the removing all Shirk* and non Muslims from all Muslim dominated neighbourhoods and joining and supporting the caliphate of the Islamic State. Yet all of this is required by his holy book of Islam—the Koran.

Anjem Choudry is a Salafist preacher. Being a fundamentalist, living in the footsteps of Muhammad, he has always preached pure Islam and acted his life accordingly. It is that the Koran demands all Muslims support Jihad and the establishing a Caliphate. It is the Koran that advocates the inequality of women and the Islamic intolerance of non-Muslims and their ways. It is the Koran that wants the West for Islam. If Britain jails Anjem for being the perfect Muslim, then surely they need to also jail Islam.

Read the rest of this entry »

Separation of Church and State is also Biblical

Screen Shot 2016-08-08 at 2.40.26 pm

Consider this: The separation of “Church” from “State” is a mandate from God made through the Bible to man, and not the other way around. When Moses took the people out of Egypt he was assigned the job of head of State and Aaron was given the job of looking after the Temple. Moses was civic and Aaron the church, The two roles never crossed and yet, they both took their directives from God

King Saul years later made the greatest mistake of his career when he stepped into the role of priest and made a burnt offering to God. He immediately lost God’s blessing and David even though a child was appointed by Samuel as the next king. King Uzziah, perhaps one of the most successful Kings of the Southern Kingdom eventually crossed that divide, went into the Temple and made a sacrifice. He was immediately struck with leprosy which rendered him unclean so could never re-enter the Temple again. The Bible is quite clear—The State and the King shall remain separate.

However history has a way of repeating itself. There are three periods of Christian history and the West that directly relate to this issue of “State” and “Church”.

Read the rest of this entry »

AUSTRALIAN STUDY: Mosques Impact Local Communities

abd05e29998b9eac4ecae45e8774f6b8

We have gone to our Council’s Planning Departments with our concerns to no avail. Even our Courts have asked for the Social Impact studies that relate specifically to Australia. Now we can go to them both with the evidence that our concerns about Mosques in Australia are warranted. Finally a detailed non-political study has been done by a recognised academic on the effects of Mosques in Australia. The Study is called “A General Social Impact Assessment of Mosques in Australian Neighbourhoods.” by Dr Frank Salter, BA (Hons), M Phil, Ph D.

In this Paper, Salter investigated the social impact of Muslims and Mosques on Australian communities. He had two proposals he wanted to explore. That:

  1. People who defined themselves by their religion create a loss of trust and social cohesion.
  2. Muslims cause additional negative social impacts.

Read the rest of this entry »

Muslim Immigration and Why it Needs to be Stopped

Seen in the streets of Sydney

Seen in the streets of Sydney

To understand the Issues with Islamic migration is to understand that unlike any other group on the planet, Muslims and Islam share an interwoven a path of living life called Sharia. Islam prescribes what they eat, who they marry, gender roles, occupations and outlook on life, food clothing and laws of communal living (Government). Their prophet Muhammad is their absolute role model and the laws of Allah their guide for living. They are regarded above any man made laws Herein is the problem for any form of Islamic immigration into the West. They run to the beat of Islam not the host country. To understand the issues for host countries of Islamic Immigration we have taken apart some of Muhammad’s qualities as the role model for Muslims and what that means for our culture.

Read the rest of this entry »

How many have to die before we address the elephant

nice-france

People are accusing Anti-Islam pages (like Stop the Mosque in Bendigo) that report each massacre as it unfolds before they know if it was Muslim-related—as being racist and divisive.

Understand these pages are also against the lies of “Political Correctness” and for good reason. The media, the Government and the police are now choosing to withhold information from the public because they don’t want to release that yet another Muslim was at the cause of a massacre or atrocity. It is an embarrassment for the multicultural experiment of Western Governments the world over, because it represents yet another breakdown in the fabric of social cohesion and security caused by the fundamentalist followers of Islam in the West.

We began in 2014, since then the pages have reported on:

Read the rest of this entry »

How we have allowed Sharia in the West.

shariasmAustralia has “politely” allowed Islamic law, Sharia to have its way in our country. This is becoming dangerous to our freedom, the equality cornerstone of our culture and it must be halted immediately. Consider the following:

Read the rest of this entry »

Selling out Journalism for Political Ends—ENEMEDIA

ENEMEDIA: Definition: (Urban Dictionary) “media–usually left-wing –that lies, distorts, censors and ignores key facts or information when reporting out of fear, ignorance, ineptitude or the typically willful promotion the a the Left side of political agendas only, choosing to dispense propaganda instead of questioning authority and practicing objective journalism”….(selling out journalism for political ends)

Sitting through seven hours of ABC coverage of our elections capped off the truth about the media in Australia—it is truly the enemy of our democracy. While many chose not to listen to the bias of the ABC election coverage, those that persisted were subject to hours of self righteous bigotry in broadcasts to our nation. So here is some feedback to our media in general.

Read the rest of this entry »

Older posts «